And finally, you can view your Pressimus profile by clicking on your profile image, and selecting your profile, and you can customize your Pressimus settings by selecting settings.
Watch quick explainer video
Finish
X

Request Invitation




Submit
Close
Submit
Stream by
The Interpreter
@Interpreter_Mag
Russian-to-English translation journal, with original analysis and commentary on Russia's foreign & domestic policy.
Interpreter_Mag
Russia Update: November 11, 2014

Publication: Russia Update
Readability View
Press View
Show oldest first
The Interpreter
@Interpreter_Mag
Russian-to-English translation journal, with original analysis and commentary on Russia's foreign & domestic policy.
Interpreter_Mag
Moscow Oil Refinery Blamed for Gas Leak May Be Closed for 3 Months


The Moscow Oil Refinery (NPZ) believed to be responsible for the gas leak yesterday, may be closed for three months, Lenta. ru and TASS reported.

The Ministry of Environment told reporters that the plant may have to be closed due to pollution of the atmosphere. NPZ is owned by Gazprom Neft, the main state oil company.

Sergei Donskoy, head of the Ministry of Environment, said that in fact NPZ was responsible for the leak of hydrogen sulfide into the atmosphere which caused the stench and smog covering some districts of the capital yesterday. He also vowed to ensure that all those responsible would be punished.

Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin urged an investigation of the toxic gas leak. The Emergencies Ministry has also confirmed that the reason for the smell was a "malfunction" at the NPZ.

Yet Gazprom Neft is denying responsibility for the gas leak. Environmental monitors found a higher concentration of hydrogen sulfide and styrene in the atmosphere yesterday, some of which had dissipated later in the day.

-- Catherine A. Fitzpatrick

The Interpreter
@Interpreter_Mag
Russian-to-English translation journal, with original analysis and commentary on Russia's foreign & domestic policy.
Interpreter_Mag
Sochi Olympics Builder Detained on Suspicion of Exploitation of Workers
Moscow Times reports that Oleg Shishkov, Omsk-based businessman and parliamentarian whose firm Mostovik was involved in the Sochi Olympics, has been detained on charges that he failed to pay numerous employees for the first half of this year.

Shishov faces charges of withholding employees' salaries for more than two months for selfish gain, which is punishable by up to three years in prison. He is also under investigation in another case on suspicion of embezzling more than 500 million rubles (about $10.7 million) from the Omsk Region budget.

Investigators say Shishov had the funds to pay his employees, but chose to keep the money for himself instead. The total amount owed to Mostovik's employees is 535,000 rubles ($11,500) — a sum investigators say Shishov should have had no problem paying considering the 17 billion rubles the company made in the first half of this year.
Shishov's company was responsible for two major Sochi construction projects, though the investigators' statement did not mention any Olympic facilities.


Human Rights Watch published a report at the time of the Olympic Games in February detailing violation of workers' rights. The Interpreter ran a report prepared by opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and Solidarity activist Leonid Martynyuk exposing corruption in the construction of the facilities. Martynyuk, who also made a video on MH17, was recently detained on spurious charges and jailed for 14 days.







The Interpreter
@Interpreter_Mag
Russian-to-English translation journal, with original analysis and commentary on Russia's foreign & domestic policy.
Interpreter_Mag
Russian Legislators Receive Responses from Military Officials on Soldiers Reportedly Killed in Combat in Ukraine

Russian military authorities have finally replied to parliamentary inquiries from national and local deputies regarding the deaths of Russian soldiers reported to have been killed in combat abroad -- with bureaucratic answers that nevertheless provide some clues.

Russia's Chief Military Prosecutor responded a query sent by Pskov legislator Lev Shlosberg, who began a probe of soldiers' deaths in combat last summer. Ekho Moskvy has published Shlosberg's LiveJournal blog entry on the response.

Shlosberg, a member of the Pskov Region assembly from the liberal Yabloko power was assaulted by unidentified men in August and was hospitalized with serious injuries after launching a probe into the deaths of members of the 76th Guards Air Assault Paratroopers' Division, who were reportedly killed in combat in Ukraine. News of the deaths began to leak out when the soldiers' bodies were returned for burial to Pskov.

In a letter dated October 28, M.L. Toporikov, head of the 3rd oversight department of the Main Military Prosecutor's Office said that his office had reviewed Shlosberg's appeals of September 18 and October 17 regarding Pskov paratroopers who died in service. The Interpreter has provided a translation:

a519af07edb6.jpg

The circumstances of death of each of the servicemen indicated in the appeal outside their permanent base is being verified at the present time under the procedure established by the Code of Criminal Procedures. With that aim, highly-qualified specialists have conducted autopsies. Oversight of compliance with law in conducting such checks has been established by agencies of the military prosecutor.

Social support measures for the members of the servicemen's families who died while performing their service duties, and the ensuring of their rights and guarantees are defined by Russian law and implemented in each case. Oversight has been established for the fulfillment of legal requirements on this score by agencies of the military prosecutor's office.

Transfer of forces from the place of permanent deployment is made and trainings are conducted in accordance with orders and instructions of agencies of military command and military officials.

Information about these activities and incidents that have occurred are not subject to disclosure in the interests of the Russian Federation, and therefore other information requested by you in accordance with Art. 6, point 1 of the July 21, 1993 Law No. 548501 of the Russian Federation "On State Secrecy" constitute a state secret, and in connection with Art. 11, point 6 of the Federal Law of May 2, 2006, no. 59-FZ "On Procedures for Review of Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation" cannot be provided.

Nevertheless, no violations of laws by military prosecutor's agencies were discovered, and no grounds for taking measures for the prosecutor's response were found.

The letter is clearly a non-answer, but Shlosberg noted that at least it constituted a recognition that indeed these soldiers died away from their base. It also means that their deaths were investigated and autopsies conducted under the code of criminal procedures, which means they are being investigated as possible criminal cases. He will now send an inquiry on each individual soldier to see what the results of each investigation is.

The reply also doesn't specify that the soldiers actually died while "at training" although the training is mentioned separate from the question of how and why they died. And the relatives of the soldiers "who were killed by fulfilling their service duties" are being provided public assistance -- and this is being monitored -- which is all very important, says Shlosberg.

The legislator also believes that the reference to state secrets is also informative because if the soldiers had in fact died while in training, there would be more detail in the answer.

I think the answer received is a step forward, even if small, in our efforts to establish the truth. There are many silences in this document, but there is no lying. And that's important. This document is more qualitative and ethical than the tactless response received by Dmitry Gudkov, a State Duma Deputy, from the RF Defense Ministry.

But "time will rewrite the last sentence of the letter," says Shlosberg, who believes the soldiers were killed in combat in Ukraine.

Gudkov, an independent member of the State Duma formerly with Just Russia, uploaded a copy of the answer he received regarding his own inquiry about the fate of the 76th Pskov Paratroopers from Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu on August 29 to his LiveJournal blog.

299658_900.jpg

Shoigu wrote that the information Gudkov had supplied "were rumors disseminated largely by the Ukrainian and certain Western media."

Despite the regular accusations of a number of Ukrainian and Western politicians cited by Western media, the Russian Federation is not a side in the conflict between government troops of Ukraine and residents of Donetsk and Lugansk Regions who do not agree with the policy of the country's leadership, which has been repeatedly officially announced by the leadership of the state and federal government agencies.


Shoigu cited Russian privacy law as grounds for refusal to provide any information on the individual soldiers. Gudkov had also asked why Shoigu had given the Pskov 76th Paratroopers' Division the Suvorov award, to which Shoigu replied that "the division has a glorious heroic history, the beginning of which dates back to the pre-war and war years of the Great Fatherland War [World War II]." More than 12,000 soldiers were given this award "for courage and heroism displayed in battles with German fascist invaders," he said, failing to explain why men born in the 1990s would receive this award.

-- Catherine A. Fitzpatrick

X

Acknowledgements